Language and politics: Dzongkha issue

26,644

With the the election campaign in full swing, the candidates are speaking to the electorates by means of common forum hosted and broadcasted by the national channel BBS. It is a part of candidate-voter familiarization process whereby the aspiring candidates are required to speak only in Dzongkha regardless of whether the voters understand or not.

Dzongkha is the national language and it is accepted by all Bhutanese whatever linguistic or ethnic background they belong to. However, the national language, as have been asserted and implied, is not the lingua-franca of most people in the south and east. Even in the south west region an ethnic community in minority speaks a different language.  For most southern districts like Samtse, Chhuka, Tsirang, Dagana, Samdrupjongkhar and Sarpang it is Nepali(Lhotshampkha) while in the Eastern districts of Trashigang, Tashiyangtse, Samdrupjongkhar, Pemagatshel it is  Sarchhopkha(Tsangla) and in Shemgang it is mostly Khengkha.

In Samtse, the need to use the local language(Nepali) for campaigning is more urgent and impelling. As the district of largest voters, Samtse candidates cannot afford to lose the votes without making themselves clear. Same is the case for Trashigang and Samdrupjongkhar. For candidates in Samdrupjongkhar, they ought to be at least bilingual, fluent in Nepali and Sarchhopkha.

While opting out of common forum, the candidates in Samtse have hoped to ease out their process of campaigning going door to door or in smaller groups in the local venues. Doing so,  they can talk in Nepali or in informal dzongkha in case of the voters not understanding Nepali.  In Dewathang, both PDP and DPT candidates could not resist speaking in Sarchhopkha for the  common forum too, according to Kuensel. One of the candidates is reported to have said, ‘There is no harm in speaking in Sarchhopkha when majoiry do not understand what we say in dzongkha.’

Looking at the utterly poor dzongkha of Rebecca Gurung, the DPT candidate of Pugli, one can only sympathize over the popularity of dzongkha as the national language. Most probably, Lila Pradhan and Madan kumar Chhetri did not want to go public the same way as Rebecca.

While the Royal government has taken a motion to transform the original local names of villages and districts in the south to sound more like dzongkha, the actual language people speak as their mother tongue is still Nepali. This name changing motion is intended to promote the assumed domination of dzongkha language in the traditional inhabited roots of Nepali speaking people.

WRD observed in refugee camps

26,644

Hundreds of school children and general exiled Bhutanese engaged themselves in the celebrations of this year’s World Refugee Day (WRD) on Thursday.

Students and general refugees take part in a mass rally organized to mark the World Refugee Day (Picture: Dikesh Lama)
Students and refugees take part in a mass rally organized to mark the WRD (Picture: Dikesh Lama)

Various donor agencies including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), camp management committee and camp-based volunteers organized separate mass rallies in Beldangi and Sanischare camps to mark WRD.

Those taking part in the mass rallies in and around the camps carried placards carrying different slogans as ‘reunite families, don’t fragment them’ and ‘we want dignified repatriation’.

Later the rallies dispersed, and turned into a mass gathering where a variety of cultural items and dramas were performed followed by speeches from camp secretaries, exiled leaders and representatives of various agencies.

Meanwhile, newly appointed UNHCR Representative in Nepal, Steven Craig Sanders, thanked the host community and the Nepalese government for housing exiled Bhutanese for 23 years.

Sanders expressed his gratitude while addressing a cultural program organized in Damak on Wednesday.

1 Family: In Nepal, family torn between new life and leaving loved ones behind

26,644

DAMAK, Nepal, June 17 (UNHCR) –Seventy-nine-year-old Keshar Singh Rai vividly remembers the day he started his life as a refugee. It was August 1992, when he came to Nepal from Bhutan with his wife Bhai Maya Rai and their three sons.

“Before leaving Bhutan we were in the greatest dilemma of our life. We made a very difficult decision to leave Bhutan without our eldest son and two daughters,” said Keshar Singh, with tears rolling down his cheeks. Their eldest son was in a different town for work and two daughters were already married and living with their husbands’ families.

Under a major resettlement programme, most refugees from Bhutan have left Nepal for other countries since 2007. But those remaining face difficult decisions; if they leave, they may never again see the relatives left behind in the region.
Under a major resettlement programme, most refugees from Bhutan have left Nepal for other countries since 2007. But those remaining face difficult decisions; if they leave, they may never again see the relatives left behind in the region (Picture courtesy: UNHCR/J.Rae)

For the last 20 years, Keshar Singh and his family have been living in Beldangi refugee camp in eastern Nepal. His three sons got married and have their own families. The patriarch and his wife now live with his second son, Harka Singh Rai.

Lately they have been grappling with another major dilemma concerning their future.

A major resettlement programme has been under way in the camps for the refugees from Bhutan since 2007. Nearly 80,000 refugees have already departed from Nepal and started their lives afresh in eight different countries.

Of the original population of 108,000, only some 37,000 refugees from Bhutan now remain in camps in eastern Nepal. With the large number of resettlement departures, the camps have been merged and closed. Currently there are only two camps hosting these refugees – Beldangi and Sanischare.

“It is a very difficult decision on whether to go for resettlement or not. We have lived a major part of our life in Nepal which is like our second home,” said Keshar Singh, describing the similarities between Bhutan and Nepal – the mountains, climate, language and religion.

His wife Bhai Maya, 77, does not remember much about Bhutan but becomes quite emotional while talking about their future. “All these years we had the hope that someday we would return to Bhutan, but the hope is dying.”

The couple discuss their future with their sons in the camps regularly and are sure that eventually they will choose resettlement. “We just want to wait for some time to hear from our eldest son in Bhutan before we take the final decision,” said Keshar Singh. “He is our son, whom we have not met for the last 20 years, and I want to meet him or hear from him once before we go to a distant land.”

Keshar Singh understands that his wish is a difficult one. At the same time he laments that once resettled he may never meet his son and daughters in Bhutan again. Harka Singh agrees with his father’s decision. “We will go for resettlement for the future of our children. My cousins left for Atlanta [in the United States] last year and they are doing very well – they have job, kids are doing well in school and recently they bought a house and a car.”

Acknowledging that they will choose resettlement eventually, Bhai Maya prefers to leave together with her family. “I would want at least my sons who live with us in the camp to be together wherever we are resettled.”

Meanwhile, the UN refugee agency continues to inform refugees in the camps that the opportunity to resettle in a new country will not be permanently available and if they are interested in resettlement they must start the process at the earliest. At the same time, UNHCR, through mobile information counselling in the camps, helps families resolve such dilemmas, providing in-depth and targeted information on solutions.

Under one of the largest resettlement programmes globally, nearly 80,000 refugees from Bhutan have begun new lives in the United States, Australia, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom.

Six years into the programme, there is still a steady stream of interest in resettlement from the refugee population. Amongst the over 37,000 remaining refugees, some 28,500 have thus far expressed an interest in resettlement.

Editor’s note: The story was first reported by the UNHCR, Nepal.

St. Louis police release surveillance in hopes of catching killer of 7-Eleven clerk

26,644

Police today released surveillance images in hopes of catching the killer or killers of a 7-Eleven clerk, Mon Rai, on July 11.

51b7771a580fb.preview-620The images show two men inside the 7-Eleven store at 5604 Gravois Avenue about the time 29-year-old store clerk Mon Rai was shot and killed. One is labeled a suspect; the other is labeled a possible witness to the crime. Police are hoping the public can identify both men.

Customers found Rai lying in an aisle early Monday, bleeding from a gunshot wound to his back. Police said the killer apparently took nothing in the store, but that there was a struggle between the victim and his killer moments before the killing, said Lt. Col. Al Adkins.

“We are working on the theory that this was a botched robbery at this point,” he said. “We can find no other reason that this occurred at this point.”

Mon Rai
Late Mon Rai

Rai, a Bhutanese immigrant who spent 19 years in a Nepalese refugee camp, came to St. Louis nine months ago with his wife and 7-year-old son. Rai’s wife is pregnant and expecting to give birth to a girl any day.

“When I came to St. Louis … my heart was full of hopes and dreams,” he wrote in an essay for a Thanksgiving program at the International Institute of St. Louis.

Rai lived in the 3800 block of Dunnica Avenue. He was taking English classes at the institute and helping as an interpreter for other refugees.

Rai started working at the 7-Eleven three days after Christmas, according to a caseworker for him and his family.

Anyone with information about the crime or the men pictured in the surveillance photos is asked to call CrimeStoppers at 1-866-371-8477.

News sourcehttp://www.stltoday.com/

Adelaide community rejoices Australian citizenship

26,644

Transforming into “brand new” Australian citizens, the Bhutanese community in Adelaide of south Australia is now rejoicing moments of being new Bhutanese-Australian, thanks to the generosity of the Australian government in accepting over 5,000 of exiled Bhutanese.

According to the Bhutanese Australian Association of South Australia (BAASA), altogether 185 resettled Bhutanese, who reached Australia since 2008 through the third country resettlement program, have received Australian citizenship, Sunday.

BAASA Preisent, Suren Ghale, said that Australian citizenship to resettled Bhutan meant the reaffirmation that this beautiful country was their home and how much they love living in Australia.

“As a Bhutanese community, BAASA always have great responsibilities to New Aussie in making them more responsible and dutiful citizens of Australia,” Ghale said.

"Brand new" Bhutanese-Australian thank Australia for accepting them in Adelaide, Sunday
“Brand new” Bhutanese-Australian thank Australia in the citizenship ceremony for accepting them in Adelaide, Sunday

Minister for Mental Health and Ageing, Mark Butler, distributed certificates of citizenship to those Bhutanese in a special ceremony organized jointly by the Bhutanese Youths Group (BYG) and Department of Immigration and Citizenship, according to the BAASA’s website.

“I am proud to be an Australian. I am very happy to be recognized as a dignified citizen of Australia,” one of the recipients Kamal Dahal told Bhutan News Service.

Bhanu Adhikari, the first person to set foot on the Australian soil under the resettlement scheme in the May of 2008 was one of the 185 Bhutanese receiving the citizenship.

“I am proud to be a citizen of Australia after 23 years of life in exile,” a televised report quoted Adhikari as commenting.

While, his son Bikram Adhikari expressed the need of increasing number of quotas for accepting the Bhutanese refugees by the Australian government. Adhikari is one of the volunteers of the Bhutan News Service from Australia.

Meanwhile, BYG felicitated Dom Kafle for his tireless volunteerism in educating the community members through the citizenship class.

“Thank you Adelaide Bhutanese Youths for that humble mention. You have encouraged me,” Kafle mentioned in his Facebook.

Rights activist Ratan Gazmere with junior artists in the citizenship ceremony
Rights activist Ratan Gazmere with junior artists

While, the BYG lauded his contribution by saying that it was their (BYG members) plasures to honor Kafle. “You have made very great help to our community regarding citizenship. We’d like to thank you once again,” said commenting on Kafle’s Facebook wall post.

Most of those who were present during the citizenship ceremony were on typical Nepali dress, while a few were also seen wearing Bakkhu and Kira.

Meanwhile, human rights activist and Chief of the Association of Human Rights Activists (AHURA) Bhutan, Ratan Gazmere, was actively involved in making the program.

Gazmere made his artistic appearance in the stage  on the traditional Nepali dress and dhaka topi, and a  madal hung on his neck.

“We are very happy that we are in a great country called Australia. And, from today (Sunday) we are the citizens of this great nation,” Gazmere told the Australia’s leading national television news SBS after the ceremony.

The ceremony also saw some cultural performances from the Bhutanese artists.

नवलका चित्र पुन: छनोटमा

सिड्नीको मिन्टो निवासी भूटानी चित्रकार नवल खतिवडाका चित्र पुन: हार्टलैण्ड शरणार्थी कला पुरस्कार २०१३ का निम्ति छनोटमा परेका छन् ।

अस्ट्रेलिया देशभरिबाट जम्मा ३० वटा चित्र पुरस्कारका निम्ति छनोटमा परेको उक्त प्रतियोगितामा  खतिवडाका चित्र पुरस्कारका निम्ति छनोटमा परेको आयोजक कमिटी मल्टिकल्चरल आर्ट भिक्टोरियाले जानकारी गराएको छ । १२,००० अस्ट्रेलियन डलर राशिको उक्त पुरस्कारका निम्ति छनोट गरिएका चित्रहरुलाई जुन १८ देखि २७ सम्म फ्लिन्डर्स लेन मेलबोर्नमा प्रदर्शनीका निम्ति राखिने जानकारी समेत गराइएको छ ।

छनोटमा पर्न सफल दिदी र भाइ शीर्षकको चित्र
छनोटमा पर्न सफल दिदी र भाइ शीर्षकको चित्र

छनोटमा पर्न सफल दिदी र भाइ शीर्षकको यो चित्र थोरै समयमा नै आफूले क्यानभासमा उतारेको नवल बताउँछन् । “आफ्नै सामाजिक परिवेश, रहनसहन, रीतिस्थिति र सांस्कृतिक परिवेश झल्कने तथा पारिवारिक मेलमिलाप र आपसी प्रेम व्यक्त हुने चित्र बनाएको छु” एक भेटमा उनले बताए ।

विगत दुई वर्ष यता वेस्टन सिड्नी क्षेत्रमा उनका अन्य शीर्षकका चित्र छनोटमा पर्दै र पुरस्कृत हुँदै आएका पनि छन् तर यस पालिबाट भने समग्र अस्ट्रेलियाभरि हुने चित्रकला प्रतिस्पर्धामा खतिवडाका चित्र छनोटमा पर्न सफल भएका हुन् ।

वर्तमानमा नर्सिङको अध्ययन गर्दै गरेका नवलले चित्रकलालाई आफ्नो जीवनको रुचिको विषय रहेको बताएका छन् । रुचि भएर पनि नेपालको शरणार्थी शिविरमा उनको चित्रकारिताले हुर्किने खासै मौका पाएको थिएन तर अस्ट्रेलिया आएबाट नै उनका चित्रकलाले झाङ्गिने र फस्टाउने स्थान पाउन थालेको अनुभव नवल स्वयं सुनाउँछन् ।

पदम काफ्ले (समाचारदाता, सिड्नी)

A diatribe on press

26,644

At the outset of his election campaign in Thimphu, the DPT president and former Prime Minister vented out his anger over the criticism brought in the media, of his government for the last five years in power. Addressing a crowd in the YDF hall, Jigme Y Thinley said to the media houses, “I will not leave you”.

It is another indicant of  attack on press freedom in the country, if DPT is chosen to form the government for next term too. His accusation was that the news media and social media are altogether engaged in ‘anti-national activities.’  If so, is Jigme Y Thinley ready to ban the media houses or sue them for their anti-national conduct?

The other parties who contested in the primary round also felt the pang of his diatribe. None could agree on his remark that the media is creating regionalism and rift between the government and the King, the government and the people or the like. DCT spokesperson, Dr. Tandin Dorji said that it is baseless allegation upon the media. Contrary to what JYT said, the media is actually educating the mass against regionalism or regional politics.

The Bhutanese press has been critical on some corrupted government officials, the mismanagement of development funds under the DPT government since 2008.

While Tenzing Lamsang and his media house has been too vocal to point out the fallacies of DPT government, Bhutanomics is always in the left wing to cry foul against JYT and his team. Kuensel, the national daily has not spared the rod to thrash any ill-conceived ideas of the powerful people. It appears the press has been trying hard to exercise the freedom of press and freedom of speech as enshrined in the constitution. If the threat is what it meant, Jigme Thinley is trying to go to the power where there is no opposition and no press to throw water at him.

Jigme Thinley in the capacity of prime minister of first elected government once said, “the media is playing a role of opposition.” This was perhaps the soft version of what is now a sadistic remark, a jaundiced eye upon his critic.

According to JYT, the Bhutanese media is the fourth organ of government, not fourth state. Hence the inference, an organ of the government is not entitled to criticize the government under which it is operating.

Concomitantly, the national security act of Bhutan is applicable to any anti-national activities, if considered to be so.  The anti-national activities are punishable by law, either as life sentence or eviction from the country. Going by the history of its application in 1992/93, these ‘media anti-nationals’ who criticized the government should be thrown behind the bar or evicted out from the country, with statement signed as ‘I am leaving the country on my own will.’

Can we imagine that episode to repeat, as happened in the 1990s? Are the scribes in Bhutan ready to see that befall on them?

It is the time for  Journalist Association of Bhutan to act and seek attention of other journalist federation around the world if the JYT threat continue to grow and if press freedom under such nascent democracy is jeopardized.

OBCA convention concludes, Bangaley elected as Chairman

26,644

The fourth convention of Organization of Bhutanese Communities in America (OBCA) concluded on June 16 following discussion on the formation of Non-Resident Bhutanese (NRB) and giving continuity to community based programs, among others, and electing Hari Bangaley Adhikari as its new Chairperson.

The convention executives and delegates in Colorado
The convention executives and delegates in Denver, Colorado, United States of America.

The three day convention that kick started on June 14 also elected some new faces in its 29-member new board of directors and various office bearers, said a statement issued by OBCA.

The convention also entrusted Hari Uprety with the responsibility of the Vice-Chairman. Similarly, Hari Dhakal and Aita Raj Rai have been elected as Secretary and Treasurer for a tenure of two year.

The organization awarded Pratab Subba, present camp secretary of Sanischare Refugee Camp with the certificate and amount of the US dollar 501 recognizing his contribution to the Bhutanese fellows.

Yug Dabadi, who represented Punya Foundation, highlighted the latter’s activities through audio-visual presentation. According to Dabadi, majority of participants gave a positive feedback to the social services conducted by the foundation.

During the convention, an unofficial session on Non-Resident Bhutanese (NRB) was held for the interested participants facilitated by RP Subba and Mohan Tamang, according to OBCA.  Some 60 individuals participated in this session.

And, the  discussion of participants concluded that NRB concept should be further discussed, and it will be brought to attention of different community leaders to seek their ideas and suggestions.

However, the newly elected chairman of OBCA, Bangalay seemed reluctant on that aspect, and he expressed that for now he will be working selflessly to help people address their issues at local level.

“My concern at the moment is not the unity of ABA/OBCA or formation of NRB, but helping our friends at different cities solve their problems at my organization’s capacity”, stated Bangaley adding that he will work closely with ABA though.

“I have a very good relationship with members of ABA that would certainly help us move ahead, and I shall immediately start talking to friends at ABA and OBCA for possible joint future programs at different places”, adds Bangaley who is also the main person hosting ABA convention in Syracuse, NY in July this year.

The outgoing chairman of OBCA, DJ Khaling thanked everyone for supporting him during his tenure, and endorsed that the organization will continue its service to communities in the days ahead.

Parangkush Subedi from Philadelphia presented his recommendation for addressing the mental health issue of the community on the second day of the convention.

Some of the recommendations he spelled out for the OBCA to initiate networking are: create venue for the community members to exchange their ideas, share knowledge and perceptions, emotional management, understand and identify the copy-cat perceptions, positive role of media to prevent suicidal thoughts and the like.

“Resettled Bhutanese committed suicides based on impulsive act, and not a planned one. Therefore, prevention should focus on the decision making moment,” said Subedi.

According to him, more socialization was needed to express their feelings and the emotional management.

“We need to educate our community members to express their mental health condition openly with their health providers. Mental health condition such as depression cannot be solved by ‘one size fit all approach’; it should be client centric and problem based approach.”

This year’s convention of OBCA was hosted in Denver, Colorado, and was made possible by the tireless effort of Global Bhutanese Community Colorado, Inc.

(With inputs from Yug Dabadi, Denver, Colorado)

DNC also observes foundation day

26,644

Members of the Druk National Congress (DNC) also celebrated its 19th foundation day in Kathmandu, Sunday.

DNC_RKD_logo_smallTraditional Bhutanese game, ‘Khuru’ was played among members to mark the occasion, honoring its founder-president Late RK Dorji, DNC General Secretary Karma Dupthob said.

Kesang Lhendup, President of the party reminded the members and friends present during the celebration programme, that democracy has arrived in Bhutan with the efforts and sacrifice of Bhutanese people and exile political forces but the genuine form of democracy is still denied to Bhutanese, added Dupthob.

“Lhendup expressed his expectation that the new government after the July general election would show more courage and resolve in consolidating the democratic gains thus far and initiate the negotiation with dissident forces in exile.”

DNC also demanded unconditional release of all political prisoners.

Controversial to mention here, both the DNC factions claimed June 16 as foundation day of the parties.

It must be remembered that the Rongthong Kuenly Dorji’s party, Druk National Congress (DNC) suffered a vertical split after its vice-presidents duo Chheku Drukpa and Gup Khilla and general secretary Narad Adhikari decided to walk out from it.

They later formed a new party, Druk National Congress – Democratic (DNC-D) by merging the then existing Druk Mimang Tshogpa (DMT) of Thinley Penjore.

Penjore became president of DNC-D on January 3, 2002 after his party was merged with breakaway group of DNC, and continued to lead this party until he opted the third country resettlement in 2011.

The official declaration of the party split was brought to public notice after on September 1, 2001.

GNH and Unhappy People

26,644

SB-Subba-small-220x144The obscure concept of philosophy of Gross National Happiness (GNH) of fourth king Jigme Singye Wangchuk is much propagated by none other than the Prime minister of Bhutan Jigme Y Thinley like religious philosophies by many Hindu and Buddhist gurus. So much so that it even mesmerized the Secretary General of the United Nations and elated to adopt 20th March as the Universal Happiness Day. The accolade has been bestowed without realizing the practicality in the country of origin, and as a matter of fact a day of happiness set aside for the world which is marred by hunger, diseases, xenophobia, racial prejudice, discrimination, human rights violation, civil and religious war every second.  It’s a state of mind that neither be felt, smelt, touched, tasted nor has shape and size measurable to quantify. It is invisible and intangible as its obscurity. Yet it gained immense importance thanks to clever and smart salesmanship of Jigme Y Thinley.

It is said that the hollow philosophy was conceptualized by king Jigme Singye Wangchuk in 1972 itself when he was 17 years old. What a genius! but took  more than two  decades to make GNH public, after forcing out about 1,10,000  Bhutanese who served him with unfaltering dedication and loyalty from their ancestral homeland in 1990s and making them to suffer as refugees.  What a mockery! Of course it is a custom in Bhutan to talk in retrospect of many things including the laws. Even king Jigme Singye Wangchuk’s marriage was said to be secretly solemnized with four ladies and sired four children before making public only in 1988.

 Although the GNH-philosophy successfully caught attention of the International community, people in Bhutan, the birthplace of GNH are yet to experience and enjoy the Happiness in true sense. Perhaps, for people of Bhutan, it is just going to remain an idealistic philosophy and as rhetoric. The so-called GNH is based on four platforms: 1.Economic development 2. Cultural promotion 3. Environmental preservation, and 4. Good governance

Impact of GNH and four platforms
We have seen the first so called democratically elected government led by Jigme Y Thinley completed 5 years of governance and mulling up for another election. In five year’s period, people are more suppressed, oppressed and subdued their voices rather than enjoying democratic aspirations of freedom of expression, press and assembly as people in country of GNH other than dissent in silent and disgruntle in quiet. JYT once said even the dogs in Thimphu were smiling. That probably was mistaken for the snarl on his foolish imposition of autocratic governance and blunders of self aggrandizement, nepotism and corruptions stacked above his height. In what area have his government succeeded to commendable achievement?  If we talk of economy, the country is indebted with more than 5 billion deficit. Country is still a donor dependent country. There are about 23% people living in poverty and the government could not do much to alleviate but claimed it to have reduced to 12% and can reduce to 5% as if by magic touch given another chance. There is acute Indian rupee crisis, which was never the case before. On the cultural side, perhaps the government was able to send some teams of mask dancers to few countries to perform and show some monuments of Dzongs and monasteries.

Melting glaciers and danger of bursting glacial lakes are always causing sleepless nights while some ambitious hydro-projects are going to submerge vast area of forest, the home of hundreds of varieties of flora and fauna and displace populations rendering no alternative rehabilitation. If one talks of good governance, it was blotched by rampant corruption, nepotism and rich becoming richer including JYT himself with one Mercedes, two Landcruisers, two Prados, a Crown, a Hilux and one WagonR, Besides, his son drives the most expensive car, Hummer. Yet he was presenting a clean image outside without qualm of shame of abusing authority. His commitment of serving the people with equity and justice remained rhetoric coupled by deepening disparities.

Belying the GNH propaganda, the propagandists were busy in land grabbing and engaging their relatives in acquiring lucrative businesses and contracts. They have huge amount stash in hard currency (Indian currency) at home and deposits in the bank which could last for generations who comfortably live enjoying GNH, whereas, the poor struggle daily for hand-to-mouth sustenance and livelihood but their labor is aggregated in GNH falsely taken by the gullible International community. Draconian law like tobacco act was enacted and innocent people for carrying few packets of tobacco for self consumption was considered heinous crimes and sent to jail but a murderer like Lakpa Dorji walk free enjoying all government emoluments. Thanks to gratis of king Jigme Singye Wangchuk because he has hatred towards Lhotsamaps (southern Bhutanese), and Sarchhops (the eastern Bhutanese).

Census and deprivation of rights
There are about 80,000 southern Bhutanese, the relatives of refugees living without nationality and citizenship. They were categorized in different census category just because they happened to be the relatives of refugees, Nepali speaking and are stateless people. There are also about 5000 Tibetans who chose to stay in Bhutan, when about 5000 fellowmen were deported to India in 1980s living without census for more than half a century. All were deprived from participating in first ever democratic vote held in 2008 and are going to face the same in general election to be held in July 2013. Not only deprived of voting rights, they are deprived of all government facilities and opportunities. To avail any government opportunity, one has to obtain No Objection Certificate or security Clearance from the police. It is denied except to whose census is clear and categorized as F1 (genuine Bhutanese).

The census issue is hitting hard on many Bhutanese in the south and in the east, where the identification of the fugitive father is required by law to grant citizenship to children born out of wedlock. There are some hundreds of students who are not given right to enter the colleges after graduating grade 12, and former civil servants whose census was dropped that are always kept under suspicion and scrutiny. They are grossly marginalized from the mainstream of every social, economic and political process in the pseudo-democracy of Bhutan. It is worth mentioning that Bhutan has a constitutional provision allowing only the King to grant citizenship and land to any, if so required.

The resettlement of the refugees from the camps in Nepal is a clean chit to ethnic cleansing policy of the Royal government of Bhutan (RGOB) headed by fourth king Jigme Singye Wangchuk.  The international community being apathetic towards the plight of the 80,000 ethnic Nepali southern Bhutanese and about 5,000 Tibetans give moral boost to suppress and enact laws that are  not in conformity with International covenants and conventions. These people have to live with mental, psychological and social stigma, unhappiness and trepidation of unknown future.

Religious intolerance
There is intolerance for the freedom of religion. Sixteen Nyingmapa shedras in eastern Bhutan closed in 1997 after the demonstration by the monks and public in demand of democracy, human rights and freedom of religion remain still closed and in dilapidated conditions. The monks were arrested and some are serving life term, stripped of their robes and some were conscripted in the army. The Ningmapa head, His Holiness Dodrup Rinpoche presently residing in Sikkim is persona non-grata in Bhutan.  His followers travel to Sikkim to pay their respect. Similarly, the 10th incarnation of Shabdrung Nawang Namgyel born 2003 in a simple family in eastern Bhutan, is considered person of no entity after extradition from India. He along with his parents were kept confined in Chirang district but presently lives in Thimpu. He is supposed to be the guardian of Kagyupa Budhism, the main national religion of Bhutan.

The Royal Government of Bhutan is clever to allow construction of a Hindu temple in Thimpu but teaching of Nepali is still banned in the local primary and middle schools.  Claiming to be the paragon of tolerance and compassion, the Buddhist government of Bhutan has not promoted the construction of new Hindu temples unlike the construction of Buddhist stupas. Most existing temples in southern Bhutan are simply neglected or in dilapidated conditions. Christianity is banned, Christians persecuted and imprisoned and yet blow the trumpet of religious and spiritual approach to GNH as an important yardstick of achieving happiness rather than the materialistic quest.

GNH posing a political gimmick
The abstract and vague GNH concept suddenly came to fore to catch and divert the attention of International community with this new but utopian idea with a hope to assuage the concentration and mounting pressure on the government to address the refugee problem and pave way for fair repatriation. Had Nepal government been more assertive in the bilateral dialogues as Bhutan government and if the verification team of Nepal had their own result of findings on the basis of circumstance, testimonies and documents of the refugees, perhaps 75% of the Bhutanese refugees would have the ‘right to return’ unconditionally.  Unfortunately, this could not happen as Bhutanese team manipulated and maneuvered the Nepali team with their clever, smart and superior diplomacy and hospitality, so much so that the Nepali team concurred to the unilateral result of the Bhutanese team and illogical conditions of repatriation. The protracted nature of the issue opened avenues supporting Bhutan government relieving it from onus of taking back single refugee and creating diaspora of southern Bhutanese, whereas southern Bhutanese living in Bhutan are perpetually under the yoke of suppression, oppression, harassment and discrimination. The lands left behind by the exiles are allocated to the northern Bhutanese under a resettlement program, which itself is not free of nepotism and favoritism.

Increasing youth frustration and unemployment
The youths are so fabulously praised by the king and the government as future citizens, the pillars of future Bhutan. On the other hand, the government has not been able to provide jobs so that they could be absorbed in the income generation and nation building process. There is increasing youth frustration of unemployment coupled by increasing anti-social activities like drug abuse, alcoholism, HIV/AIDS, criminal acts as sexual assault, gang fights, murder, burglary and thefts including religious monuments and artifacts. There is increasing rural urban migration looking for GNH and creating urban population pressure and impact on social and economic infrastructures.  The government has failed to create enough job opportunities in commensurate to number of graduates passing out every year in thousands and equal number or more school drop outs or unable to continue studies for various reasons. The sons and daughters of influential elites take up few available government jobs. Only lucky poor who can excel in Royal Civil Service Commission examination (RCSC) climb the ladder of bureaucracy to enjoy GNH. Southern Bhutanese who cannot produce security Clearance that is deliberately denied from police has no chance even to sit for RCSC examination.  There is no social welfare scheme for unemployment or old age pension to compliment the GNH.

One-sided view
The alacrity of the International community to hear on one side exaggeration and lies of the Royal Government of Bhutan has and is bolstering it to frame stringent rules affecting the lives and happiness of the ordinary people. There is no respect for human rights and are some alienable rights are blatantly violated.  As a matter of fact and very sadly enough, the International community led by the super power USA, which espouses for Human Rights and Democracy in the world remains stoic, apathetic and is with the violator. However, it is to be seen for how long the International community, along with the biggest stakeholder of refugee resettlement, will take side and back up and how long the Royal Government of Bhutan can smother the nefarious acts. History cannot be erased and justice cannot be denied. Truth will prevail. It is just matter of time.

Editor’s note: The views expressed in the writing are purely of SB Subba and do not reflect any of BNS. Subba can be reached at :  [email protected]