BCAST elects new executives

26,644

The Bhutanese Community Association of Southern Tasmania Inc. (BCAST) elected its new executives through a democratic election process.

Community members and representatives from various agencies in the election hall (Picture courtesy : BCAST)

A press statement circulated by newly elected President Ganga Thapa on Saturday stated that other elected executives included Jasuda Khadka (Vice-President), Naresh Bista (Secretary), Bhim Khatiwada (Treasurer) and Khadga Thapa (Public Officer).

According to Thapa, the election was held in presence of representatives from Migrant Resource Centre, Centacare, Red Cross and Liberal MP Matthew Groom.

Hobart that houses around 300 Bhutanese is expected to receive additional people within this year, and the head counts might go up to 400, informed Thapa.

BMF training concludes

26,644

The Bhutan Media Foundation (BMF) completed a three-week long training for reporters, editors and marketing managers of different media outlets in Thimphu, Friday.

Picture courtesy : BBS

Including national trainers, seven media experts from India conducted the training that was aimed at addressing the current challenges facing the Bhutanese media.

The organizer has said that over 100 mediapersons took part in the training.

The Bhutan Media Foundation was established through a Royal Charter issued by the King on 21st February, 2010, to foster the growth of a strong, responsible media capable of playing an important role in the social, economic and political growth of the nation.

It is mandated to support the wholesome development of mass media so that it can carry out is roles and responsibilities in the interest of the democracy.

समर कक्षा सम्पन्न

राजेश कोइराला

न्यु ह्याम्सर । नेपाली-भाषी भूटानी स्कुले-बालबालिकाहरूका लागि गर्मी-विदामा म्यानचेस्टर शहरमा चलाइएको ‘समर कक्षा’ बिहीबार (अगस्त १६) सकिएको छ । न्यु इंगल्याण्ड फार्म वर्कर्स काउन्सिल र भूट्नीज कम्युनिटी अफ न्यु ह्याम्सर (बिसिएनएच) ले सयुक्त रुपमा आयोजना गरेको उक्त कक्षा ६ सातासम्म चलेको थियो ।

कसभागीहरू (तश्विर ः राजेश कोइराला)
साताको चार दिन साँझ ४- ७ सम्म भएका कक्षामा म्यानचेस्टर र कंकर्डका १६ नेपाली-भाषी भूटानी स्कूले-बालबालिकाहरू सहभागी थिए । न्यु ह्याम्सरमा यस्तो कक्षा पहिलोपटक चलाइएको हो ।
कक्षामा विभिन्न पेसा-व्यवसायमा जाँदा भविष्यमा के बन्न सकिन्छ? कुन क्षेत्रमा कसरी काम गरिन्छ? जस्ता जिज्ञासाका बारेमा जानकारी गराइएको थियो । विभिन्न पेशा-व्यवसायका व्यक्तिहरुले सोबारेमा जानकारी गराएका थिए ।
छ साताको अवधिमा बालबालिकाले तीन दिन युनिभर्सिटी अफ म्यासाचुसेट्स (डार्मिथ) को ‘सेन्टर फर इन्डिक स्टडिज’ मा क्याम्पका रूपमा बिताएका थिए । क्याम्पमा न्युयोर्क, मेरिल्याण्ड आदि ठाउँबाट पनि उनीहरूकै उमेरका अरू समुदायका स्कूले-बालबालिकाहरूसहभागी थिए । कूल ६० बालबालिकाबीच भएको निबन्ध-प्रतियोगितामा न्यु ह्याम्सरका आशीष भट्टराई र भोला गौतम क्रमश: दोस्रोर तेस्रो भएका थिए । त्यहाँ सबैखाले धर्मका बारेमा जान्ने मौका पाएको सहभागी गोविन्द भण्डारीले बताए ।
कक्षाका लागि फार्म वर्कर्स काउन्सिलले बैठक-कोठा उपलब्ध गराएको थियो भने दुई युवक विष्णु निरौला र श्याम गौतमले स्वयंसेवकका रूपमा काम गरेका थिए ।
कक्षा समापनको अवसरमा आयोजित कार्यक्रममा सहभागी आशीष भट्टराईले स्वागत-भाषण गरेका थिए भने गोविन्द भण्डारीले धन्यवाद-ज्ञापन गरेका थिए । स्वयंसेवकका रूपमा बालबालिकालाई अमूल्य जानकारी प्रदान गर्ने विभिन्न क्षेत्रका व्यक्तित्व रअन्य सहभागीलाई प्रशंसा-पत्र र प्रमाण-पत्र प्रदान गरिएको थियो । फार्म वर्कर्स काउन्सिलका तर्फबाट लिन्डा एलिस, ब्रुस योङ र बिसिएनएचका अध्यक्ष टीका आचार्यले प्रशंसा-पत्र र प्रमाण-पत्र प्रदान गर्नुभएको थियो ।

Sutlej to execute 1170 MW power

26,644

India’s state-owned Sutlej Jal Vidyut Nigam (SJVN) said it will execute two hydro power projects, namely 600 MW Kholongchu HEP and 570 MW Wangchu HEP in Bhutan in joint venture with Druk Green Power Corporation of Bhutan, reports PTI.

The DPR (Detailed Project Report) of these projects have already been completed and submitted to the Central Electricity Authority for approval, SJVN Chairman and Managing Director RP Singh said.

Singh said SJVN had also submitted the pre-feasibility report for three projects in Arunachal Pradesh, namely 60 MW Rangarandi Stage-II, 378 MW Kameng-I and 80 MW Doimukh Projects in a record time of six months, to the government of Arunachal Pradesh.

The survey and investigation works on the Si-River basin in Arunachal Pradesh is in progress, he added.

During the current financial year, SJVN’s Nathpa Jakhari Hydro Power Station achieved a Plant Availability Factor of 108 per cent as compared to 103 per cent during corresponding period of last year.

The plant targets to generate 7,000 million units of electricity and is close to achieving the target during the year.

He said with the final breakthrough in the HRT, the 412 MW Rampur HE Project is heading for completion and commissioning in September, 2013.

Company’s diversification plans into Wind power are being realised with the 50 MW capacity plant scheduled to be completed during 2013, Singh added.

Closer ties with Bhutan, Nepal

26,644

Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs Fu Ying, who has recently visited Bhutan and Nepal, talks with China Daily about her visits to these two South Asian countries.

You have recently visited Bhutan and Nepal. The Chinese people have a great deal of interest in the two countries. Could you share with us your impressions?

Yes, I have just been to Thimphu to attend the China-Bhutan boundary talks and co-hosted diplomatic consultations in Kathmandu. The visits were productive and enjoyable. Bhutan and Nepal are both situated at the southern slope of the Himalaya Mountains and are endowed with unique geographical features and rich cultural heritage.

Chine Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs Fu Ying (Picture courtesy : China Daily)

My first stop was in Paro, which has the only international airport in Bhutan. The runway lies between the high mountains, and you have to admire the skillful way the pilot navigated the plane around mountains peaks. The drive from Paro to Thimphu was an enchanting experience. We feasted our eyes on the natural scenery all around us as well as the colorfully painted traditional wooden farmhouses that looked like they were sleeping in the green valleys. The children walking in the streets were all in traditional-style uniforms and well-mannered. It is easy to see why Bhutan ranked very high on the National Happiness Index in the world.

Now to Nepal, it’s my second visit, and I found the country a lot busier and livelier. There have been lots of political changes, and it’s remarkable that the overall economic progress has continued. I remember when sitting under a huge bodi tree as we waited for a delayed flight, a young Nepalese monk explained about the search for inner peace. The calm cultural atmosphere there was deeply touching.

Bhutan is the only neighbor with whom China has not established diplomatic relations. The boundary talks have been going on for years. Could you update us on the progress?

Yes, China-Bhutan boundary negotiations started in 1984. Over the years while the talks were going on, the two sides have maintained an effective discussion on building up understanding, trust and exchanges. Thanks to the agreements reached, we have also maintained peace and tranquility in the border areas.

This is the 20th round of talks, and I found my meetings friendly, substantive and constructive. Both sides were accommodating and forward-looking. China appreciates Bhutan’s positive attitude on its relations with China. We agreed to continue exchanging visits and gradually expanding cooperation in areas of common interest while advancing the boundary talks with patience.

My visit culminated in a call on the fourth king of Bhutan. I was deeply impressed by the former king’s knowledge and sharp insight on the affairs of the outside world. The meeting was warm, and we could sense the king’s wisdom and foresight. Small wonder he came up with the vision of building “Gross National Happiness”, which is attracting wider international attention.

Nepal as China’s neighbor is at an important juncture of its political transition. What is your view on China-Nepal relations? How has your visit helped deepen the relations?

China and Nepal have always enjoyed strong and healthy relations. To quote Prime Minister Bhattarai, ours is a “problem-free relationship”. For China, Nepal is a good neighbor, good partner and good friend. I reaffirmed China’s policy of noninterference in Nepal’s internal affairs, respect for Nepal’s independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, and its people’s choice of development path. I also expressed our best hope that Nepal’s peace and constitution drafting process arrive at a successful conclusion.

The purpose of my visit was to follow up on the important visit to Nepal by Premier Wen Jiabao last January. China is committed to effectively implement the important agreements reached during the visit, including assistance programs, infrastructure projects and people-to-people exchanges. We highly appreciate Nepal’s firm commitment to the one-China policy and its position of not allowing any forces to use its territory for anti-China activities. I am glad that this policy is shared by all political parties.

The visit has also made me more confident about the future of China-Nepal trade and investment cooperation. We discussed many potential areas for cooperation. I noticed that Nepal’s traditional handicraft and its places of historic interest will prove very attractive for Chinese buyers and tourists.

The world is rapidly changing. Developing countries like China and Nepal need to work hard to maintain stability in order to pursue economic progress. We must grasp the opportunities enabled by globalization that makes it possible for us to achieve faster economic growth and industrialization, which we missed out on the past.

As was reported, you also met with the secretary-general of the South Asian Association For Regional Cooperation. What is the state of relations between China and SAARC?

Yes, I called on the secretary-general of SAARC in his office in Kathmandu. We had good discussions about how to bring the relations closer. He emphasized that SAARC saw China as a very important partner and is interested in exploring further dialogue and cooperation. I expressed China’s willingness to support SAARC and expanding cooperation with SAARC members in the areas of economy, agriculture, transportation, human resource training and disaster relief. I also invited him to visit China.

China shares a 4,700-km-long border with SAARC countries, and our joint population is close to 3 billion, almost half of the world’s total. China is committed to good neighborly relations with SAARC members and attaches importance to its contacts with SAARC as an organization. China became a SAARC observer in 2006. In 2012, China appointed its ambassador in Nepal as its resident representative to SAARC. We are ready to work with SAARC to build stronger ties.

Both Bhutan and Nepal have close ties with India. What is your reaction to press reports that China and India are engaged in a strategic rivalry in South Asia?

From my point of view, China and India are partners, not rivals. As the two biggest emerging economies, China and India share common interests in major international and regional issues. In recent years, China-India relations have seen strong momentum of growth thanks to the consensus of both leaders.

China respects India and all other South Asian countries for developing close and friendly cooperation. We share a common belief in the principles of equality and mutual benefit in state-to-state relations. China would like to promote its relations with all South Asian countries including Bhutan and Nepal. This is not targeted at any third country, nor will it hurt the interests of other nations. Instead, it will only add to the common prosperity of the region. China is also ready to expand cooperation with India in promoting regional development. For example, the need for connectivity can be better met if China, India and South Asian countries work together and avail themselves of the good opportunity offered by the strong growth in the region.

President Hu Jintao remarked that the 21st century should be one of peace, development and cooperation. This is a worthy goal for us all to strive for.

Courtesy : China Daily

Dzongkha: an emerging issue

26,644

In the following paragraphs, my expressions might sound contemptuous to Dzongkha, but I am not posing myself as xenophobic. If I have to name my three best teachers, one comes to my mind is Dzongkha lopon (teacher) Yonten Phuntsho, at Jigme Sherubling High School. I leave it to the readers to comprehend the motive behind extremist decision, radical enforcement, conspiracy to thwart public appeal, and the disaster we are witnessing today.

Dzongkha, the national language, was gradually becoming the issue in most southern districts where Nepali speaking population was dominant.  Goshi Junior High School was not an exception.  Until 1985, English, Dzongkha and Nepali prevailed as major languages taught in junior high schools while by the turn of 1986, Dzongkha became inevitably compulsory to pass the common/board examinations of grade 6 and 8. A student sitting for the board exams in grade 6 or 8 could fail only in Nepali but not in English or Dzongkha, to get through.

This came along coupled by the scheme of Drigam Namzha, the compulsory Drukpa etiquette for all to follow.  Using Nepali in many official communication (which used to take place before) and public gatherings in presence of  high-level bureaucrats began to be viewed as opposing  Driglam Namzha. GJHS and other primary schools in Dagapela could not make a good result in 1986 owing to a large number of students failing in Dzongkha. That year, only 2 out of 37 students of GJHS in eighth grade, (5.40%) passed in Dzongkha.

Poor results across the whole dungkhag alarmed the teachers, students and the parents. They appealed to the Department of Education (DoE) to review the decision, suggested the DoE to allow the student to study both the languages and  both the languages be given equal importance as before 1985. The argument was not that Dzongkha should be taken out of the curriculum, but more improvements in teaching of Dzongkha were called and the department of education apprised of the situation by local leaders. The then National Assembly member, Mr. K.B Chauhan submitted agenda in the National Assembly (NA); he later found it omitted from the list and never given chance to present the issue of Dagapela community in the National Assembly.   The department of education turned a deaf ear to all the request and suggestion from local heads and the national assembly member.  In spite of allowing Nepali language in middle schools a major subject to score higher, teaching of the language was completely banned in 1989.

Soon after the September  uprising, all schools in dagapela were closed forcing about 2500 students ( of Namchela,Powgang and Dokap  and Goshi) to go without schools. It is only after the eviction thinned out the cluster of villages, Goshi school opened in 1994 as Dagapela Primary School in close proximity to  Dungpa office, but admission to commoner students was obdurately denied until 1998.  Primary schools in Dokap, Namchela and Powgang opened only in 1999 to allow access to education to the remaining public.

Premeditated eviction
I feel it relevant to recall some events in the history of eviction by the absolute monarchy headed by the fourth King Jigme Singye Wangchuk and orchestrated by the avaricious and philistine cabinet members.  The King, fell puppet to the hands of these obsequious aristocrats, mostly posing affinity to the royals. He was brainwashed, misinformed and influenced to satisfy their insatiable ego and greed. It is a bitter truth that under the influence of such extremist group, JSW lost senses, imbibed hallucination of making Bhutan a Nepali-speaking-free country and ordered the carnage. In a meeting with Dagana Dzongda, army officers and Dungpa of Dagapela on March 1991, JSW vowed to uproot total Nepali speaking citizens from the country and ordered them to carry out the mission accordingly.

SHERIG SAGA further describes the condition of the school as quoted: “The school got its name as Dagapela Community Primary School after it was shifted to the Dungkhag Complex in 1994.  There were about 180 students from PP-VI with two regular teachers. In 1997, there were 378 students with only the regular teachers (two zhungkha language teachers and one general teacher).”

 Though Schools were reopened to show the community that government was doing something, discriminative attitude continued to linger around long after; separate classes were created for the children of Nepali speaking children and effective teaching and learning neglected until 2005. When the then crown prince, Jigme Geshar Namgyal Wangchuk visited Dagapela in 2004 he commanded some improvements in the school system.

Thanks to some international human rights group such as AI and ICRC, the perpetrators could not actually accomplish what they intended as to terrorize the commoners and compel them leave the country. AI delegates visited Bhutan in January 1992; their findings were published as given in quote:

“Amnesty International has collected testimony of arbitrary arrests, Ill-treatment and torture, particularly in the period after demonstrations in September 1990. It has also received reports of attacks on civilians; some attributed by the government to ngolops or “anti-nationals”, many of whom allegedly belong to the Bhutan People’s Party (BPP), an opposition organization founded in India in June 1990″.

Thousands of innocent civilians were arbitrarily arrested, brought to the RBA detention center and tortured. AI delegates visited refugee camp in Nepal in November 1991; its findings were given in the quote:

“The testimonies obtained from refugees in Nepal include accounts of various forms of ill treatment, degrading punishment and, in some cases, torture at the hands of the security forces. Beatings with canes, sticks, batons, chains, leather belts and rifle butts, on the back, head, arms and feet of detainees, were reportedly carried out. One woman said the saw her husband tied to a post outside in the jail compound and left overnight. Several people described being “kicked around like a football” and being made to “fight each other like animals”, apparently for the entertainment of army officers; these practices reportedly resulted in injuries to the prisoners’ heads and shoulders. Prisoners reportedly had their hands bound and were denied food and water, particularly during the initial stages of their detention. Some people recounted how on requesting water they were told to drink their own urine. On some accessions food, which was inedible, such as rice, which had been contaminated with glass or sand, was reportedly given to prisoners”.

 The catastrophe that happened in southern Bhutan in nineteen nineties, the darkest page of country’s history is the aftermath Royal fantasy. According to refugee camp registration record October 31, 1994 85,906 Bhutanese citizens had sought protection from UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) of which 30,527 were school going children.

Human Development Report 2011 in beautiful chart portrays adult literacy rate 53.6 %, net primary enrolment 93.7%, and unemployment rate in age group 20 to 64 years as 3.3 %. However, in Dagapela the story is different.  35% of ages 6 to 12 years old children are not in school, about 60% of children between age 13and 18 years have no schooling/not in school currently, adult literacy rate between ages 19 to 45 is about 25%, adult literacy rate among age 46 and above is 10%, unemployment rate in some blocks is as high as 65% but average unemployment rate of ages 20 to 64 stands 50%.

Conclusion
In the land of GNH, fear and intimidation looms over the sky, hatred, discrimination and uncertainty carry the day on the land, trifle smiles forced out by oppressor while GNH encapsulates the crime. “Truth alone triumphs, not falsehood” (Mundaka Upanishad); time has come to reflect that lies cannot stand the ultimate divine justice. My only humble suggestion is: uncover prejudice, disclose lies, PUNISH CRIMINALS, give justice to the downtrodden; let justice roll down the hills; let justice flow through rivers and streams; let justice echo across the valleys; let cool breeze of social justice blow through every house of every village; let justice shower over those who are suffering of injustice; let justice shower over the tombs of those victims who died in injustice. Let the teachings- righteousness and truthfulness of the Buddha prevail once again to save all Bhutanese.

(The writer, who graduated from Goshi Junior High School in 1987, served as Camp Secretary of Goldhap, and Primary Curriculum Planner cum Teacher Trainer at the Bhutanese Refugee Education Program (BREP) run by the Caritas Nepal. He can be reached at [email protected])

GNS begins from home

26,644

A central theme of an article, I regularly assign to students I teach at universities around the world, suggests that, “people of all ages, races, gender, and nationalities must develop the capacity to speak ‘truth’ to power, regardless of the personal or professional consequences they may face by so doing.”

Regardless of how socially, politically or personally effective telling people what they want to hear may appear to be, it is dysfunctional for the people, organisations and cultures where it is practised.  Unfortunately, it is practised a lot in Bhutan.

The article is aligned with a book I assigned, entitled “How Come Every Time I Get Stabbed In The Back, My Fingerprints Are On The Knife.”  I could not assign those readings this semester, due to technology and resource constraints all-too-common at the Gaeddu College of Business Studies (GCBS).  I regret that I did not do more to provide the students with the wisdom, and practices they provide.  I am even more worried that social, industrial, and political leaders in Bhutan do not appear to be familiar with the lessons they provide.

Thus, while the outcome of the GNH conference in Brazil may be leaving some Bhutanese leaders feeling frustrated and stabbed in the back – catching the culprit is easy – LOOK IN THE MIRROR.

Recently, I failed to speak truth to power when GCBS was visited by a minister of the government.  He proclaimed, “ … the world will be adopting a new paradigm of economic development – GNH – by 2017, with Bhutan leading the way.”

I am sure his belief was sincere, but I couldn’t discern whether his remarks were based on folly, arrogance, naïveté, false pride, self-deception, ignorance, faith or hope.

Indeed, as it now appears, the Brazil summit on GNH will be producing yet another toothless UN type statement on GNH, which is greatly toned down from previous statements.  Clearly, as I expected, Bhutan and GNH’s fifteen minutes of fame is about up.

However, there is a lot of good, which can come from this development.  It should awaken the Bhutanese people to the importance of “speaking truth to power.”  I don’t mean speaking truth to any of the countries, who sought to tone down the language.  Rather, the Bhutanese need to speak truth to their own leaders!  Someone – many indeed – should have been telling your leaders that they were rushing to the world stage to proclaim GNH too fast, and with too little to offer.  Therefore, I would like to practice what I preach.  So here is what I’d like to say.

Come on Bhutan, did you ever really think the world was buying what you were selling?  The only people that naïve would be the people, who have never set foot in your land, or have been escorted around on neatly guided and well scripted tours.  At present, after nearly six months of working/teaching and travelling about the most progressive and developed side of Bhutan — call it the Punakha-Paro-Phuentsholing (3P) triangle — I will honestly say that Bhutan isn’t and wasn’t in the position to tell the rest of us how to conduct their affairs, or that they all needed to embrace an untested model of economic development.

My students, who will be graduated by the time/if this is published, can readily parrot the principles and pillars of GNH, but few can engage in any substantive dialogue about the concept’s underlying assumptions, implications, operations, benefits, limitations or applications.

In each assignment and class discussion, I regularly asked, “What are the GNH implications?

The result was either a recitation of the pillars or stone cold silence!

If this is the level of understanding of GNH possessed by the most educated elite of Bhutan, I shudder to imagine how they will attempt to implement even its most basic tenets, when they take positions in business or government.  Indeed, before espousing the efficacy and utility of GNH, a deeper level of understanding must be cultivated across the entire population.  Moreover, we need to ask and honestly answer the following questions about the state of affairs in Bhutan.  The questions could be framed as follows, “Does the typical Bhutanese citizen enjoy:

  • world class education from grades PP to 12;
  • access to Bhutanese-based internationally-accredited colleges and universities;
  • outstanding primary medical care and access to quality daily maintenance medicines;
  • the ability to purchase high quality goods, professional and basic services (plumbers, electricians, etc.) that are from Bhutan;
  • living in a residence that meets any standardised and acceptable set of building codes, and that is free from mold and other environmental toxins, hazardous to health;
  • freedom of religion or speech, including the right to assemble in front of the Royal Palace and call for an end to pursuing GNH;
  • would other citizens go to war to protect the rights of GNH or even monarchy dissidents?
  • living in or visiting a capital that is safe, secure and unpolluted;
  • expedient, reliable, outstanding customer service from either private businesses or government agencies that is free from bureaucratic red tape;
  • a government with substantially less corruption than that found in other nations;
  • living in a country that has near the lowest rates in the world for diseases, resulting from smoking, alcohol, or drug consumption;
  • affordable, reliable, speedy 24/7/365 internet access;
  • regular interaction with people, who hold radically different ideas and beliefs about everything, from the best football team to family values or social norms;
  • expedient and safe travel to major cities around the country;
  • breathing air that is 99.9 free from diseases, such as tuberculosis and pneumonia;
  • clean and environmentally friendly restrooms/toilets in public buildings and schools;
  • travel and see what the rest of the world has to offer;
  • a deep understanding of the strengths, limitations and personal impacts of GNH;
  • easily exchange Ngultrum for the currency of host country when travelling;
  • the right to vote on a “bill” or “law” that selects between GNH and GDP as the measure to follow in Bhutan;
  • an environment, particularly in the corridor, free from trash and bio-waste that are regularly collected and reliably disposed in an environmentally safe fashion?

The answer, for most would be, a resounding NO.

So it begs the question, “Who is Bhutan to tell the rest of the world what to do, especially given that such GNP countries such as Singapore, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands, Germany and, heaven forbid, the USA engage in and have institutionalised practices that are far closer to the practice of GNH than Bhutan?

I have visited, lived and/or taught in those countries. To most of the above, their answer is YES.

Therefore, I am very sorry, Bhutan, I love your people.  The warmth, which my family and I have been received, is second to none!  But it’s time to get real and get honest.  Please devote your time, efforts and preciously scarce resources to getting your own house in order.  You have to have something tangible to offer before someone can buy.

Brazil’s GNH conference is only a failure if Bhutan doesn’t learn the simple lesson that both charity and economic development begin at home.

Courtesy : The Kuensel

Child refugees become model students

26,644

Thirteen members of the Bhutanese Student Group of Pittsburgh spent the morning Tuesday cleaning litter and debris from the streets and green spaces in Prospect Park in Whitehall.

Picture courtesy : DIANA NELSON JONES/Staff blogs(Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

These are high school and college students who, until a few years ago, were living in a refugee camp in Nepal after having been forced to flee Bhutan because of ethnic discrimination.

Ragu Gautam was born in the camp that he grew up in. His sister Uma remembers arriving there when she was about 5.

Prospect Park is home to many hundreds of Bhutanis who are ethnic Nepalese who fled Bhutan. Many spent 15, 20 years as refugees in camps before being cleared by the state department to migrate to welcoming countries.

Bhim Dahal said that Pittsburgh has been quite welcoming. He just finished at the Community College of Allegheny County and hopes to get into the University of Pittsburgh to study biomedical engineering.

Ragu is entering Duquesne University this fall to study neuroscience, and Uma is currently studying at CCAC and wants to pursue a career in nursing.

They are photographed at right with bags and rubber gloves that they bought by selling T-shirts and a documentary that they made. It is in their language but they hope to have it translated for wider distribution.

The photo below shows Ragu picking up tiny pieces of glass that used to be a beer bottle. Ragu has a scholarship but he is also working as a night janitor, a job to which he rides the trolley.

The students formed the club in 2011 to begin offering information and support to younger students who needed help with scholarship and financial aid applications.

They also try to be role models for younger kids, to keep them from getting into trouble. And they accompany their elders to appointments and to shop, usually on the bus, as translators.

CourtesyStaff blogs/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bhutan seeks China’s help for a seat at UN high table

26,644

Bhutan has sought China’s support for a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council for the term 2013-14. This was revealed by the Bhutanese government after its leaders held border talks with a visiting Chinese delegation in Thimphu on Friday.

The Prime Minister Thinley with Chinese Vice Foreign Minister (Picture courtesy : BBS)

“The talks were held in a warm and friendly atmosphere,” the Bhutanese foreign ministry said in a statement. “It will provide the opportunity for the two nations to better understand each other’s positions, which will facilitate an early and just settlement of the boundary issues.”

The meeting discussed Bhutan’s aspiration to serve as a non-permanent member of UNSC, elections for which are scheduled for October this year, the Kuensel reports.

An eight-member Chinese delegation led by vice foreign minister Fu Ying participated in the border talks just six weeks after the two countries established diplomatic ties for the first time.

China is expected to bargain hard before helping Bhutan achieve its international ambitions in the form of a non-permanent seat at UNSC.

Beijing might ask Thimphu to reduce its dependence on India, and discourage any future visit by the Dalai Lama to the country.

Courtesy : Times of India

Family happy in new home in city

26,644

Already a refugee from her native Bhutan, Indira Bhandari decided to leave Christchurch for the more stable earth of Palmerston North.

NEW HOME: Indira Bhendari left Christchurch so she could raise her son Suvrat Nepal in a less earthquake-prone environment (Picture courtesy :MURRAY WILSON/Fairfax NZ)

“It was always moving and shaking,” she said. “I felt unsafe all of the time.”

Mrs Bhandari and her 9-month-old son, Suvrat Nepal, moved to Palmerston North in January.

They were one of four refugee families believed to have moved to the city because of the Canterbury quakes.

Mrs Bhandari spoke to the Manawatu Standard after a University of Canterbury study was released saying most former refugees in Christchurch had coped well with the earthquakes.

Researchers, led by health science graduate Mohamud Osman, spoke to 105 refugee families who were living in Christchurch at the time of the September 2010 quake.

Three-quarters of participants said they had coped well, with spirituality and religious practice being an important support for many.

Less than 20 per cent said they received support from mainstream relief agencies.

Refugee Services Manawatu area manager Kevin Petersen said the four families who moved after the quakes had settled in well in Manawatu.

Staff from the Manawatu office helped with Refugee Services’ response in Christchurch after the February 2011 earthquake.

Mr Petersen said he was not surprised a large proportion of refugees had not sought help from government agencies after the quakes.

“There are language issues, issues of familiarity.”

At times of stress people sought help from those they knew or groups, like Refugee Services, which had helped in the past, Mr Petersen said.

Mrs Bhandari said she received great support in Christchurch, not only from Refugee Services and the Bhutanese community, but also from Civil Defence and Work and Income.

Her home was not damaged in the quake but her suburb was hit by liquefaction, making travel difficult. She also spent seven days without power or running water.

While Mrs Bhandari’s brother still lives in Christchurch and her husband is in Nepal, she does not plan to move back.

“I’m happy here,” she said.

Courtesy : Stuff.co.nz