Country gets first woman justice

42-year-old Tashi Chhozom has become the country’s first woman justice following her appointment at the Supreme Court (SC) on August 3.

Tashi Chhozom (Picture courtesy : Kuensel)

Following the recommendation of the National Judicial Commission, the King on August 3 appointed Chhozom as an SC justice, in accordance with article 21 of the Constitution.

“I’m humbled to be elevated to such a post at such a young age,” the Kuensel quoted newly appointed Chhozom as saying. She is the youngest among all SC justices.

The Supreme Court of Bhutan comprises of the Chief Justice and four associate justices. Her appointment at SC has completed all five positions.

BRCF marks its 15th anniversary

26,644

The Bhutanese Refugee Children Forum (BRCF) marked its 15th anniversary amidst various programs in Beldangi, Monday.

APF Inspector Bijay Hamal expressing his commitment against violence on children

Stakeholders from different camp base organization expressed their  willingness and commitment to jointly work against violence on children in order to promote overall development of children in the refugee camps.

Camp Secretary of Beldangi Camp, Dhan Bir Subba, who was present during the function as a special guest highlighted current situation of children in camps and even raised questions regarding increasing number of child drug abusers.

Other speakers to extend their solidarity towards violence on children included Armed Police Force (APF) Inspector Bijay Hamal, Danzom Sampang of Global Bhutanese Literature Organization (GBLO), and K.B. Nepal from TPO Nepal.

Different artists also performed various stage programs during the event.

Gelephu Dungpa beats Christian pastor, threatens to kill him

Gelephu Dungpa Pema Wangda hit one of the Bhutanese Christian pastors, Pema Sherpa, on his forehead and chest on Tuesday, and threatened to finish him if he did not comply with the authority to stop preaching christianity in the kingdom.

One of Sherpa’s friends has been quoted as reporting to various media immediate after the action. It is learnt that that the Dungpa even took out his patang (sword) and threatened to kill the pastor.

Including Sherpa, four pastors were summoned by the Dungpa, who attacked the pastor after the three others had left.

No any government authority has furnished details regarding the warning and physical punishment.

Since the constitution has accepted only Buddhist and Hindu as regions, Bhutanese Christians have been facing tough situations in the country.

बेलडाँगी बजार व्यवस्थापन कार्य सुरु

डिकेश लामा

लामो समयदेखि विवाद परेर अलपत्र परेको बेलडाँगी बजार व्यवस्थापनका लागि भिट्टा वितरण कार्य शुरु भएको छ ।

बेलडाँगी बजार | फाइल फोटो / बि. एन्. एस्

दमक नगरपालिकाले स्थानीय बासिन्दासँग भाडामा लिएको जग्गालाई आवश्यक व्यवस्थापन गरी व्यवसायका लागि वितरण कार्य सुरु गरेको बेलडाँगी बजार व्यवस्थापन समितिका सचिव चन्द्रप्रसाद गुरागाँईले बताए ।

समितिले शुक्रबारसम्म १ सय बढी व्यवसायीको नाम दर्ता गरिसकेको जानकारी दिएको छ । समितिले बेलडाँगी बजार र शिविरभित्र सडक आसपास क्षेत्रका अव्यवस्थित पसललाई पिपिरे लाइनको नयाँ बजार क्षेत्रमा व्यवस्थापन गर्ने जानकारी दिएको छ ।

पछिल्लो समय साँघुरो बेलडाँगी बजार क्षेत्रमा सडक आसपासमा टहरे व्यवसाय संचालनमा आएपछि बजार ज्यादै अव्यवस्थित भएको समितिका अध्यक्ष नैनसिंह भण्डारीले बताए ।

समितिले शिविरभित्र र बाहिरका सडक क्षेत्रका व्यवसायीलाई नयाँ बजार क्षेत्रमा आउनका लागि पटक पटक जानकारी गराई राखेको र अटेर गरी संचालन गरे आवश्यक कार्वाहीका लागि नगरपालिका कार्यालय मार्फत कार्वाही सुरु गरिने बताएको छ ।

Dhakal replaces Mishra in BNS editorial team

26,644

Buddha Mani Dhakal has been appointed as new Chief Editor of the Bhutan News Service after T.P.Mishra tendered his resignation from the post.

Buddha Mani Dhakal (right) has replaced outgoing Chief Editor T.P.Mishra from August 3, 2012

Issuing a press statement, Bhutan Media Society (BMS) on Friday said a decision was made at its board meeting to appoint former editor of the APFA Bhutan as the Chief Editor, replacing the outgoing chief editor Mishra with effect from August 2.

Dhakal joined exiled media as Chief Editor of the Bhutan Reporter in 2004. Currently, he is based in Kentucky, USA.

The statement said, “We want to inform our valued readers and donors that Buddha Mani Dhakal has been appointed to lead the editorial team of the Bhutan News Service from August 3, replacing the outgoing editor Mishra.”

The statement further mentioned that the Society shall remain forever indebted towards the contributions made by the outgoing chief editor T.P Mishra.

North Carolina based T.P.Mishra, who was leading the BNS editorial team since 2009, resigned from his post, citing lack of time to take his editorship and regular studies together.

A three-year graduate on mass communications from the Purbanchal University of Nepal, Mishra started his journalism career as a reporter for the then published Bhutan Reporter from 2004. Later Mishra also worked as Chief Editor of the Bhutan Reporter from 2007 until 2009 and is author of ‘Becoming a Journalist in Exile’. In a resignation tendered to the board, Mishra has extended his gratitude to his media colleagues and friends of BNS/BMS for their support and coordination during his tenure.

Reinstating its commitment towards professionalism of Bhutanese media in exile, the Society has also thanked all of its donors for continuously extending their helping hands in effective operation and management of Bhutan Media Society and its affiliates.

“We hope that the supports from our esteemed donors will continue as we have received a dynamic person to lead the BNS editorial team,” added the statement.

BMS clarifies position of I.P. Adhikari

The Bhutan Media Society said that it also has reviewed the affiliation of I.P.Adhikari at Society and its affiliates.

Indra Adhikari (Picture courtesy : Yubasansar.com)

Accepting the fact that Adhikari has started operating his own news site as a parallel entity from Adelaide of Australia to compete with Bhutan News Service, the Society decided to announce publicly that Adhikari has been focusing simply on his own site since early this year.

“We are extremely sorry to inform our donors and readers of the Bhutan News Service that Indra Prasad Adhikari is no more associated with our team,” BMS said in its statement.

Adhikari, who is one of the founders of Bhutan News Service formed in 2006, was President of Association of Press Freedom Activist (APFA) Bhutan, Chief Editor of the apfanews.com and former Editor-In-Chief of the Bhutan News Service.

BMS also mentioned that it was compelled to clarify his non-affiliation to the Society and its affiliate BNS to avoid confusions among readers and well-wishers.

According to the Society, Adhikari’s personal correspondence with some of its well-wishers and regular writers were found to be highly sensitive, aimed at tarnishing the image of Bhutan News Service in long-run.

“We want to inform our readers and donors that Adhikari will not represent Bhutan Media Society and its affiliates officially henceforth.”

JAB decides to investigate accusation on The Journalist

26,644

For the first time in the media history of Bhutan, the only private association of the working journalists – Journalists Association of Bhutan (JAB), has decided to investigate accusation put on The Journalist in connection to suicide of a middle school student.

Late Wangchuck with his father (Picture courtesy : The Journalist)

A steering committee meeting of the association decided to handle the case, and determine if the news report followed media ethics or not.

The Journalist sent a formal request letter to JAB to investigate if their reporting on the suicidal case was ethical.

The newspaper has sought JAB’s help following accusation of Minister for Education Thakur Singh Paudyal.

The Minister accused the newspaper of sensationalizing news in order to instigate students to misbehave, which The Journalist refuted.

The Journalist, which was launched as the country’s fifth private paper on December 21, 2009, had covered a story on suicide of Sonam Wangchuck of Kamji School earlier in June.

Bhutan – China equation

26,644

Bhutan and China have long locked their horns in terms of maintaining a non-aggressive border area spanning about 470km between the two countries that characterizes the sovereign nations.  It was in 1984 that Bhutan’s border dispute with China was first discussed, but without much knowledge of the public.

Chinese incursions had begun long ago, as far back as 1967. But, Bhutan’s barter trade with Tibet was inexorable since sixteenth century and China was cognizant of flow of goods across this international border.

After the revision of Indo-Bhutan friendship treaty of 1949, some elites think, Bhutan is free to choose and expand her own diplomatic circle; a shift in the policy independent of the South Block. This rationale of making one’s own choice of partners has indeed motivated the DPT government to establish diplomatic ties even with the countries led by communist governments reaching as far as Cuba. Thus relation with the northern neighbor has definitely become more imperative; given that India’s defense policy thinkers take Bhutan’s buffering position for granted.

Had it not been for the unbalanced relations of Bhutan with India and China, Chinese technology of mass production would have invaded Bhutan and traversed a trade route to the south. Chinese investments would have come to build major roads, bridges, airports, dams and hydro-power plants across Bhutan. Today India enjoys that privilege of becoming major development partner of Bhutan and also considers Bhutan a viable market of her labor force, essential commodities like vegetables, rice, salt, cooking oil and fuel.

The meeting of Bhutan’s prime minister and Chinese premier Wen Jiabao at the sidelines of Rio20+ conference in Brazil added a milestone in forging a formal diplomatic relation, despite some dubious nature of Chinese activity in north western border. The most strategic area in the Sino-Bhutan border is the Chumbi valley, a tri-junction of India, Bhutan and China that can raise hair for Delhi, Beijing and Thimphu equally.  Although India has always maintained that refugee issue is of bilateral concern between Nepal and Bhutan, the dispute over border demarcation between China and Bhutan constantly ring the alarm bell in Delhi. While China does not have any opinion on the refugee issue, India has played a successful role in thwarting the repatriation moves by refugee themselves and never entertained the proposal of India’s intervention by rights activists (Indo-Bhutan Friendship Society) or by the visiting heads of Nepal government.

Gopilal Acharya, a journalist, has written an analytical opinion for kuensel( July 29/30) about the China factor of Bhutan’s diplomatic policy advancement vis-à-vis India. According to the article, the meeting of Jigme Y Thinley and Chinese premier is actually backed up by India, and not just Bhutan’s unilateral decision. If that be the scenario, Bhutan is not free of India’s guidance on foreign policy matters. However, establishing formal Sino-Bhutan relations will ultimately benefit Bhutan and probably strengthen the campaign by Jigme Thinley to secure a seat for Bhutan in UN Security Council.

Dagana’s human capital

Let me clarify my perspective on issue of southern uprising in 1990.  I respect all human beings, cultures, religions and languages, but at the same time I denounce all extremists whatever the ethnicity, culture, religion they belong to. My wordings might sound acerbic to many. Please do not misunderstand me of pouring vengeance to humble and hardworking Sarchhops or Ngalongs.  I have deep respect for those humble citizens (all ethnicities living in Bhutan) who are toiling and making an honest living. Ethnic cleansing that took place in southern Bhutan in the 1990s is not a byproduct of inter-ethnic tension or fight among ordinary citizens. It is the byproduct of arrogant, extremist group which consisted of corrupted bureaucrats, justice bias and coldblooded killers (military) who were at the helm of government then and their besmirched confidants in the districts.

My grievances are geared towards that extremist group which was responsible for ethnic cleansing in the south and covering the crime, taking the side of Buddha. Buddha and Buddhism despises these criminals because they killed a civilization and ordinary Bhutanese citizens hate these boisterous criminals because they lied the general public and played foul upon them.

In fact, they (extremist group) framed four lies to cover the crime (taking for example the facts about Dagapela):

(i)  Illegal immigrants – in the census of 1982/3 to prepare for citizenship ID cards distribution, Dagapela  had a clean chit as  there were no complications which meant there were no illegal immigrants.

(ii)   Outside marriage – Dagapela sub-division had only three outside marriage cases in 1990. Of those, one is in exile and two are still inside Bhutan

(iii) Over staying on work permit- Dagapela saw only two Nepali laborers (Nepali Citizen) named Dhan Bahadur Mukhia and Dil Bahadur Rai over stayed the work permit, but the contractor managed to bribe the then police in-charge Passang Tshering and kept them for 3-4 years. Unfortunately, both of them contracted diseases while working in the cardamom plantations and because the host (contractor) didn’t care for their treatment both of them died in the jungle in late eighties.

(iv)   Voluntary migration- 12,600 citizens (refugee camp registration record October 31,1994 ) of Dagapela were staged to sign voluntary migration form, threatened of dire consequences (example given to the people of Dagapela was death penalty like Dharmaraj Gurung, Punya Prasad Dhakal,Bisweswor Lakai and Homnath Gautam ) upon denial to sign voluntary migration form, staged for a sham compensation which was 15% of actual value then, looted their property, snatched citizenship documents and evicted from the country.

Reviewing “Eviction Options – Historical Human Disaster” an article written by Santi Ram Poudel published in apfanews.com on November 23, 2011 gives clear example of the circumstances that forced the people of Dagapela to leave the country.

In fact formal settlement of Nepali speaking people in Dagapela sub-division began with appointment of Krishna Bir Gurung as Muktihar stationed in Tashidin in 1902/3. However, informal settlement said to had begun ten to fifteen years prior to that. As informal settlement had not attracted many settlers and had not generated revenue as expected by the Penlop, he commanded a formal settlement. Muktihar kept the patta (portfolio) of Tashidin mandal for himself, appointed mandals (village heads) for other blocks and initiated the settlement in Dagapela. Settlement slowed down in 1930s and ended in 1940s. Unauthorized settlement didn’t take place in Dagapela after 1945 so the propaganda floated by extremist group as ‘flushing out of illegal immigrants who have overstayed entering the country in sixties’ is farce.

Goshi School was upgraded to Junior High in 1980. Since the establishment, thousands of students attended this school and over five hundred graduated. Mr. Dorji Tamang was the longest serving local teacher; he taught in this school for about twenty years. Late K.G Nair was the second in this order; he was the headmaster for thirteen years and before retiring he taught as general teacher for two years. Late N. P Regmi was the third longest serving teacher; he taught for fourteen years. Distinguished educationists like late B. B Biswa, Mr. Krishna Tamang, Mr. Gopi  Khadka, Mr. D. R Gautam, Mr. Keeran Gautam, Mr. Rajman Tamang, Mr. D. R Nepal and Mr. Tika Biswa studied in this school in the sixties and some of them started teaching in this school in the seventies. When this school was closed in 1990 there were about seven hundred twenty five students and about twenty-seven teaching staff of which ten were non-Bhutanese.

Please accept my apology for I include these names because I owe respect to them. They are not only the living pages of history of GJHS but also the living history of Dagapela sub-division, the history which the extremists have obliterated to cover the heinous crime. These personalities embrace thousands of pages of it; my effort is gently turning the pages for readers to value. These great personalities had once in their life, walked in this compound, studied in these classrooms, tilled this field, planted these trees, built terraces and garden. These are the shining stars that lit the name of this school and these are the heroes who deserve thousand pages of the glorious history of this school. Among prominent personalities MP Hemant Gurung,  Dr.Tapas Gurung, Dr.Man Bir Ghishing, Dr.Basanta Rimal, Dr. Laxmi  Prashad Dhakal; among engineers B. B Ghising, Shree Kumar Chhetri, Yadu Ram Acharya, Suresh Nepal, Yadunath Regmi, Bal Bir Thapa, T. B Poudel, C.B Dahal, Santiram Poudel;  among advocates Jagat Subba, D. B Rimal; and  among successful women Tulsa Sharma, Chandrawati Chamlagai, Bhagirathi Lakai, Krishna Pradhan, Bishnu Gurung, Bhagawati Pradhan, Bidya Chhetri,Chandra Pradhan and hundreds of  other  successful professionals studied in this school.

Among other schools of Dagapela, Powgang Primary School that served the children of Emerey and Dorona block for a decade has no mention of its existence at all.

All Dagapelian know that some miscreants torched the school in 1990, all Dagapelian condemn that ruthless act, but deliberately omitting its existence in a research document prepared by RUB under the leadership of Zangley Drukpa and Thinley Gyamtsho is a deplorable act, eliminating the history of people who lived for over a century.

The writer, who graduated from Goshi Junior High School in 1987, served as Camp Secretary of Goldhap, and Primary Curriculum Planner cum Teacher Trainer at the Bhutanese Refugee Education Program (BREP) run by the Caritas Nepal. He can be reached at [email protected]

Editor’s note : This was the second part of the writer’s article  Bhutan: truth alone triumphs, not falsehood that the BNS carried in two parts.

Editor’s Note: Padam Rizal is one of the contributing authors at Bhutan News Service (BNS). This piece and/or his opinion doesn’t reflect the official view of BNS

PF supports other four students

26,644

The Punya Foundation (PF) said it has provided four scholarships for higher secondary education in the Bhutanese refugee camps in Nepal.

Punya Foundation scholars with their guardians and its volunteers (Picture : Durga Pokhrel/BNS)

The Foundation said that like in the previous academic year, it selected four vulnerable SLC (School Leaving Certificate) graduates following a thorough selection process last week.

The four scholars included Tika Ram Gurung (Beldangi-II), Indira Rai (Sanischare), and Purna Bahadur Tamang and Abishek Darjee (Beldangi-II Extension), according to Foundation’s US Coordinator Dhruva Mishra.

According to him, an independent team of judges and volunteers including school teachers, community leaders, camp management committee and representatives from the local host community selected those scholars, who received individual grant of US $200 for this year.

The amount could be renewed based on the students’ academic results, informed Mishra.

The Foundation is also learnt to have been planning to select two students from the host community.

Those students would be from primary to secondary levels from government schools of the refugee-affected host community, according to journalist Tilak Niraula, who coordinated this year’s scholarship program on behalf of the Punya Foundation.

Involving donations from resettled Bhutanese from various countries, the Foundation has been operating scholarship program in Nepal since last year.

Last year, the Foundation had provided four scholarships in the refugee camps and next four in the host community.

Courtesy : Punya Foundation

Imbroglio of Bhutanese Hindu diaspora: an Indian perspective

26,644

Bhutan is the only country in the world to measure happiness with its Gross National Happiness Index. But, its ethnic minority are deprived of their inalienable human rights by the Bhutanese government and are living as refugees in many countries. Their plight has been unaddressed by the International community till now. As per official data, twenty percent of Bhutan’s population belonging to Nepali-speaking Hindus who were forcibly evicted in 1990 due to the ethnic-racial policies of Bhutanisation.

For having asserted their human rights to practice their faith, mores and customs, they were termed as terrorist and being threat to security of the country by the  Bhutanese government. Under various pretexts, the ethnic minority was evicted and was forced to flee the country.  At present, they live as refugees in Nepal and in India. In Nepal, given its political instability and third-world country status, they could not determine to resolve the issue. As a result, they continued to live in camps in the Jhapa and Morang districts of Nepal for the past twenty one years.

When the refugees were having many health hazards due to lack of basic amenities in the camps, on the face of humanitarian crisis, the international communities came forward with the third country resettlement programme. Under the scheme, some of them were able to emigrate to the following countries such as the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Norway, Canada and so on. In the case of India, when the refugees were fleeing Bhutan, it allowed its territory for the safe passage of the Bhutanese  into Nepal. Some of them were allowed to settle in Siliguri and nearby districts of West Bengal and Assam. Though India is a member in the executive committee of the UNHCR, it has not ratified any of refugee conventions or protocols.

The Bhutanese Hindu refugees are living without any refugee status in India unlike the Tibetan refugees. They are not having any welfare benefits in pertaining to  refugees. They work as casual labourers in the unorganized sector so that they could meet their basic needs. It is very disturbing to say that India has been indifferent to the plight of the Bhutanese Hindu  refugees though it has very cordial relationship with Bhutan for so many years. India has been saying that it is a problem between Nepal and Bhutan.

They should engage in sustained dialogue among them to solve the impasse. In the last 21 years, the governments of Nepal and Bhutan have gone through sixteen rounds of talks but these have not led to any conclusion as yet. Nepal and Bhutanese refugees themselves strongly feel that India should step in to resolve the issue. But, India sticks to its ‘hands off’ policy so far. As said earlier, Bhutan and India relations have always been warmth. Bhutan sells its surplus hydro energy to power deficient India.

In return, India has been giving its helping hand for the economic development of  Bhutan. In order to update the 1949 Bhutan-India friendship treaty, a new treaty was signed which is known as Bhutan-India friendship treaty 2007 which reaffirms or fosters the relations of friendship and neighbourliness between India and Bhutan. The Indian political parties which are having considerable influence in this part of region have failed to act as pressure group to sort out the crisis of  Bhutanese Hindu refugees.

Having left out in the lurch, Bhutanese refugees along with some political parties formed the’ National Front for Democracy’ for their repatriation on 28th May,2007. For about 15,000 Bhutanese refugees in order to leave for Bhutan reached Mechi bridge which is the Nepal-Indo border, but, they were refused to pass through Indian territory by the Indian government security officials. Apart from refusal, they were manhandled by the Indian security establishments. In the scuffle, one young refugee named Sherbahadur Shiva died and  some of them  were injured. India agreed to provide compensation for those who were injured and faced death after negotiations. But, India has not honored its agreement so far.

Under this circumstance, India had a chance to press its ever friendly neighbour Bhutan for resolving this crisis. Instead, it suppressed the uprising of the refugees for asserting their human rights. Recently, India recognized that Bhutanese Hindu refugee problem is an international issue which is a welcome sign from its earlier stand. New Delhi should step in to  end the issue given its stature  as emerging world economic power. If need be, India could use its ‘smart power’  to convince Bhutan.

After achieving independence from the British, India formed non-alignment alliance with many Asian and African countries. India helped many Asian and African countries to achieve freedom from the colonial regime through non-alignment alliance. In the same way, the primary task of India   at present is that it should help some Asian and African countries to  achieve democratization in the respective Asian and African countries. In the absence of democratization, the ethnic minorities whose varied interests are being muzzled under the majoritarian ethnic or religious nationalism. As a result of this, there have been ethnic conflicts or strife-torn since independence in many of the Asian and African countries.

Bhutan is one such country where the democratization has not yet happened. Recently, it proclaimed that Bhutan is a democratic country from the monarchial form of government in 2008. Despite dawn of  democracy, the monarch is  still holding its grip over power and it deceives the people their inalienable rights. The true sense of democratic values are yet to crystallize in the governance of the country. For the sake of economic interests, India should not ally with the ruling elites of Bhutan, it should persuade Bhutan to find a solution to the plight of the Bhutanese Hindu refugees.  India had already missed the many opportunities which came it its way to end the dead lock.  It is an imperative task ahead of India to resolve the long due issue. But,the solution should be acceptable to all the aggrieved parties India could alone solve the problem being a close neighbour and more influential country in the region. Let India help the Bhutanese Hindu refugees to lead a dignified life in their homeland. Let us all show our solidarity for the hapless Bhutanese Hindus in defense of their human rights.

The author is Research Fellow, Centre for Policy Analysis ; the article is based on a presentation at the Symposium on ‘Bhutanese Refugees: The Tragic Story of the Forgotten People’ by Human Rights Defense (India) in New Delhi on 14 July 2012